Bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a retrospective cohort analysis with elimination of incorporation bias.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies support the diagnostic role of bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis (BALL) in patients with suspected hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Our study aim was to determine the spectrum of BALL findings with elimination of incorporation bias in non-fibrotic and fibrotic patients and assess correlates of positive BALL cut-off and BALL association with long-term outcomes in those with fibrotic disease (f-HP). METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was pursued of patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for interstitial lung disease. Strict study enrollment was based on recent ATS/JRS/ALAT diagnostic guidance meeting 'moderate' or higher diagnostic confidence. BALL findings were assessed in both fibrotic and non-fibrotic HP patients with regression and survival analysis pursued for correlates of positive BALL cut-off and long-term outcome. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients (88 fibrotic and 60 non-fibrotic) meeting moderate or higher diagnostic confidence were included. Median BALL in f-HP was 15% compared to 19% in non-fibrotic patients, with only 28% of f-HP meeting diagnostic cut-off (≥ 30%) compared to 41% of non-fibrotic. For f-HP, centrilobular nodules on computed tomography was positively correlated with a diagnostic BALL (OR 4.07; p = 0.018) while honeycombing was negatively correlated (OR 6.9 × e-8; p = 0.001). Higher BALL was also associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.98; p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: With elimination of incorporation bias, most patients with well-described HP did not meet diagnostic BALL thresholds. Higher BALL was associated with better long-term survival in those with fibrosis, but its diagnostic role may be more additive than characteristic or distinguishing.

Influence of the timing of bronchoscopic alveolar lavage on children with adenovirus pneumonia: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Adenovirus pneumonia is prone to severe clinical and imaging manifestations in children. Bronchoscopic alveolar lavage (BAL) is an important adjunctive therapy for patients with severe imaging findings. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of the timing on the efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage in children with adenovirus pneumonia. METHODS: This study included 134 patients with adenovirus pneumonia treated with BAL at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center from January 2019 to January 2020.They were classified into the severe and mild groups. Based on the timing of BAL, each group was divided into the early BAL layer (received BAL within 1-9 days of the illness course) and the late BAL layer (received BAL within 10-14 days of the illness course). The clinical data of patients with different BAL timings were analyzed in two groups. RESULTS: Among the 134 patients, 70 were categorized into the mild group and 64 were categorized into the severe group. Of the 134 patients, 42 patients received BAL early (mild group: n = 21 and severe group: n = 21) and 92 patients received BAL later (mild group: n = 49 and severe group: n = 43). In the mild group, the fever and hospital duration were shorter in patients who received BAL early than in those who received BAL later (p < 0.05). However, in the severe group, there were no statistically significant differences in the fever and hospital duration between patients who received BAL early and those who received BAL later. However, the need for mechanical ventilation and the incidence of BAL complications, such as new need for oxygen, were higher in patients who received BAL early than in those who received BAL later in the severe group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For mild adenovirus pneumonia, early BAL may shorten the fever and hospital duration. However, early BAL in severe cases might not shorten the course of the disease or improve prognosis and may even increase the risks of mechanical ventilation and BAL complications.

Clinical role of bronchoalveolar lavage in dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in DM-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with DM-ILD who underwent bronchoscopy between October 2015 and September 2019. We then collated clinical features, laboratory data and bronchoscopy findings. The follow-up study was terminated on the 1 May 2020. RESULTS: A total of 113 DM-ILD patients were included in this study, including 27 patients with acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia (A/SIP) and 86 patients with chronic interstitial pneumonia (CIP). The A/SIP group had significantly lower proportions of lymphocytes and eosinophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) than the CIP group, but had a significantly higher proportion of neutrophils. Pathogens were discovered in BALF from 28 (24.8%) patients. Twenty-five (22.1%) patients commenced or changed antibiotic therapy on the basis of their bronchoscopy results. Lymphopenia and intensive care unit care were significantly associated with pathogen-positive BALF findings. Complications of bronchoscopy occurred in nine (8.0%) patients; fever (5.3%) was the most common complication. Twenty-five deaths (25/106, 23.6%) were observed during a mean follow-up of 22 months. Age, A/SIP and anti-MDA5 antibody were identified as independent predictors of a poor outcome, while mechanic's hands was an independent protective factor. However, cellular and pathogen findings in BALF had no significant influence on 30-day or overall mortality. CONCLUSION: Bronchoscopy is a relatively useful instrument to evaluate ILD in patients with DM, and BAL can improve the diagnosis of infection. However, cellular and pathogen findings from BALF had no significant influence on prognosis.

Changes in the management and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic. / Modificações no manejo e desfechos clínicos de pacientes críticos sem COVID-19 durante a pandemia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether changes in medical care due to the application of COVID-19 protocols affected clinical outcomes in patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study carried out in a thirty-eight-bed surgical and medical intensive care unit of a high complexity private hospital. Patients with respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit during March and April 2020 and the same months in 2019 were selected. We compared interventions and outcomes of patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic with patients admitted in 2019. The main variables analyzed were intensive care unit respiratory management, number of chest tomography scans and bronchoalveolar lavages, intensive care unit complications, and status at hospital discharge. RESULTS: In 2020, a significant reduction in the use of a high-flow nasal cannula was observed: 14 (42%) in 2019 compared to 1 (3%) in 2020. Additionally, in 2020, a significant increase was observed in the number of patients under mechanical ventilation admitted to the intensive care unit from the emergency department, 23 (69%) compared to 11 (31%) in 2019. Nevertheless, the number of patients with mechanical ventilation after 5 days of admission was similar in both years: 24 (69%) in 2019 and 26 (79%) in 2020. CONCLUSION: Intensive care unit protocols based on international recommendations for the COVID-19 pandemic have produced a change in non-COVID-19 patient management. We observed a reduction in the use of a high-flow nasal cannula and an increased number of tracheal intubations in the emergency department. However, no changes in the percentage of intubated patients in the intensive care unit, the number of mechanical ventilation days or the length of stay in intensive care unit.

OBJETIVO: Analisar se as modificações na atenção médica em razão da aplicação dos protocolos para COVID-19 afetaram os desfechos clínicos de pacientes sem a doença durante a pandemia. MÉTODOS: Este foi um estudo observacional de coorte retrospectiva conduzido em uma unidade de terapia intensiva clínica e cirúrgica com 38 leitos, localizada em hospital privado de alta complexidade na cidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina, e envolveu os pacientes com insuficiência respiratória admitidos à unidade de terapia intensiva no período compreendido entre março e abril de 2020 em comparação com o mesmo período no ano de 2019. Compararam-se as intervenções e os desfechos dos pacientes sem COVID-19 tratados durante a pandemia em 2020 e os pacientes admitidos em 2019. As principais variáveis avaliadas foram os cuidados respiratórios na unidade de terapia intensiva, o número de exames de tomografia computadorizada do tórax e lavados broncoalveolares, complicações na unidade de terapia intensiva e condições quando da alta hospitalar. RESULTADOS: Observou-se, em 2020, uma redução significante do uso de cânula nasal de alto fluxo: 14 (42%), em 2019, em comparação com 1 (3%), em 2020. Além disso, em 2020, observou-se aumento significante no número de pacientes sob ventilação mecânica admitidos à unidade de terapia intensiva a partir do pronto-socorro, de 23 (69%) em comparação com 11 (31%) em 2019. Contudo, o número de pacientes com ventilação mecânica 5 dias após a admissão foi semelhante em ambos os anos: 24 (69%), em 2019, e 26 (79%) em 2020. CONCLUSÃO: Os protocolos para unidades de terapia intensiva com base em recomendações internacionais para a pandemia de COVID-19 modificaram o manejo de pacientes sem COVID-19. Observamos redução do uso da cânula nasal de alto fluxo e aumento no número de intubações traqueais no pronto-socorro. Entretanto, não se identificaram alterações na percentagem de pacientes intubados na unidade de terapia intensiva, número de dias sob ventilação mecânica ou número de dias na unidade de terapia intensiva.

COVID-19 Diagnosis in Case of Two Negative Nasopharyngeal Swabs: Association between Chest CT and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Results.

See also the editorial by Little in this issue.

Modificações no manejo e desfechos clínicos de pacientes críticos sem COVID-19 durante a pandemia / Changes in the management and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar se as modificações na atenção médica em razão da aplicação dos protocolos para COVID-19 afetaram os desfechos clínicos de pacientes sem a doença durante a pandemia. Métodos: Este foi um estudo observacional de coorte retrospectiva conduzido em uma unidade de terapia intensiva clínica e cirúrgica com 38 leitos, localizada em hospital privado de alta complexidade na cidade de Buenos Aires, Argentina, e envolveu os pacientes com insuficiência respiratória admitidos à unidade de terapia intensiva no período compreendido entre março e abril de 2020 em comparação com o mesmo período no ano de 2019. Compararam-se as intervenções e os desfechos dos pacientes sem COVID-19 tratados durante a pandemia em 2020 e os pacientes admitidos em 2019. As principais variáveis avaliadas foram os cuidados respiratórios na unidade de terapia intensiva, o número de exames de tomografia computadorizada do tórax e lavados broncoalveolares, complicações na unidade de terapia intensiva e condições quando da alta hospitalar. Resultados: Observou-se, em 2020, uma redução significante do uso de cânula nasal de alto fluxo: 14 (42%), em 2019, em comparação com 1 (3%), em 2020. Além disso, em 2020, observou-se aumento significante no número de pacientes sob ventilação mecânica admitidos à unidade de terapia intensiva a partir do pronto-socorro, de 23 (69%) em comparação com 11 (31%) em 2019. Contudo, o número de pacientes com ventilação mecânica 5 dias após a admissão foi semelhante em ambos os anos: 24 (69%), em 2019, e 26 (79%) em 2020. Conclusão: Os protocolos para unidades de terapia intensiva com base em recomendações internacionais para a pandemia de COVID-19 modificaram o manejo de pacientes sem COVID-19. Observamos redução do uso da cânula nasal de alto fluxo e aumento no número de intubações traqueais no pronto-socorro. Entretanto, não se identificaram alterações na percentagem de pacientes intubados na unidade de terapia intensiva, número de dias sob ventilação mecânica ou número de dias na unidade de terapia intensiva.

Abstract Objective: To analyze whether changes in medical care due to the application of COVID-19 protocols affected clinical outcomes in patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study carried out in a thirty-eight-bed surgical and medical intensive care unit of a high complexity private hospital. Patients with respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit during March and April 2020 and the same months in 2019 were selected. We compared interventions and outcomes of patients without COVID-19 during the pandemic with patients admitted in 2019. The main variables analyzed were intensive care unit respiratory management, number of chest tomography scans and bronchoalveolar lavages, intensive care unit complications, and status at hospital discharge. Results: In 2020, a significant reduction in the use of a high-flow nasal cannula was observed: 14 (42%) in 2019 compared to 1 (3%) in 2020. Additionally, in 2020, a significant increase was observed in the number of patients under mechanical ventilation admitted to the intensive care unit from the emergency department, 23 (69%) compared to 11 (31%) in 2019. Nevertheless, the number of patients with mechanical ventilation after 5 days of admission was similar in both years: 24 (69%) in 2019 and 26 (79%) in 2020. Conclusion: Intensive care unit protocols based on international recommendations for the COVID-19 pandemic have produced a change in non-COVID-19 patient management. We observed a reduction in the use of a high-flow nasal cannula and an increased number of tracheal intubations in the emergency department. However, no changes in the percentage of intubated patients in the intensive care unit, the number of mechanical ventilation days or the length of stay in intensive care unit.

Rentabilidad del lavado broncoalveolar en la población pediátrica / Bronchoalveolar lavage usefulness in the pediatric population

OBJETIVOS: Analizar la eficacia diagnóstica del lavado broncoalveolar y su impacto en el manejo terapéutico en pacientes pediátricos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo incluyendo a los pacientes a los que se les realizó un lavado broncoalveolar por parte del Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica entre 2009 y 2019. Se ha dividido la muestra en dos grupos: pacientes hemato-oncológicos y no hemato-oncológicos. Se han recogido variables demográficas, el resultado del lavado broncoalveolar y la actitud terapéutica posterior. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 45 lavados broncoalveolares en 38 pacientes. El grupo hemato-oncológico constaba de 25 lavados broncoalveolares. Los pacientes tenían una edad media de 9,99 ± 2,34 años. El 80% de los pacientes tenían tratamiento antiinfeccioso previo al lavado broncoalveolar. El cultivo del lavado broncoalveolar fue positivo en el 52% de los casos. El resultado del lavado broncoalveolar influyó en un cambio de manejo terapéutico en un 24% (6/25). Se produjeron 3 complicaciones posoperatorias, todas leves. En el grupo no hemato-oncológico (n = 20) la edad media era de 6,70 ± 5,17 años. El lavado broncoalveolar fue positivo en el 25% y supuso un cambio de manejo en un 5% de los pacientes. Este grupo tuvo una tasa de complicación del 30%, dos pacientes requirieron ventilación mecánica. CONCLUSIONES: Según nuestros resultados, el lavado broncoalveolar en los pacientes hemato-oncológicos ayuda al diagnóstico microbiológico en procesos respiratorios infecciosos y es relativamente bien tolerado. En los no hemato-oncológicos, tiene una baja rentabilidad diagnóstico-terapéutica, con una tasa de complicaciones no desdeñable. Sería necesario individualizar el balance beneficio-riesgo en cada paciente

OBJECTIVE: To analyze bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostic effectiveness and impact on therapeutic management in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage at the pediatric surgery department from 2009 to 2019. The sample was divided into two groups: hemato-oncological patients and non-hemato-oncological patients. Demographic variables, bronchoalveolar lavage result, and subsequent therapeutic attitude were collected. RESULTS: 45 bronchoalveolar lavages were carried out in 38 patients. The hemato-oncological group consisted of 25 bronchoalveolar lavages. Patient mean age was 9.99 ± 2.34 years. 80% of patients had received anti-infective treatment prior to bronchoalveolar lavage. Bronchoalveolar lavage culture was positive in 52% of cases. Bronchoalveolar lavage results translated into therapeutic management change in 24% of cases (6/25). 3 postoperative complications were recorded, all mild. In the non-hemato-oncological group (n = 20), mean age was 6.70 ± 5.17 years. Bronchoalveolar lavage was positive in 25% of cases, and translated into management change in 5% of patients. Complication rate in this group was 30%. 2 patients required mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, bronchoalveolar lavage in hemato-oncological patients helps achieve microbiological diagnosis in infectious respiratory conditions and is relatively well-tolerated. In non-hemato-oncological patients, diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness is low, and complication rate is not negligible. The risk-benefit balance should be individually considered in each patient

Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Transbronchial Biopsy in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.

PURPOSE: Bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy can be a useful tool in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but patient selection for this procedure remains poorly defined. Determining clinical characteristics that help with patient selection for bronchoscopy may improve confidence of ILD classification while limiting potential adverse outcomes associated with surgical lung biopsy. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that were associated with change in multidisciplinary ILD diagnosis (MDD) before and after incorporation of BAL and TBBx data. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ILD patients at a single center who underwent bronchoscopy in the diagnostic workup of ILD. We performed sequential MDD both pre- and post-bronchoscopy to calculate the frequency of change in diagnosis after incorporating information from BAL and TBBx and identify features associated with change in diagnosis. RESULTS: 245 patients were included in the study. Bronchoscopy led to a change in diagnosis in 58 patients (23.7%). The addition of TBBx to BAL increased diagnostic yield from 21.8 to 34.1% (p = 0.027). Identification of antigen, HRCT scan inconsistent with UIP, and absence of a pre-bronchoscopy diagnosis of CTD-ILD or IPAF were associated with a change in diagnosis after bronchoscopy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests clinical features that may assist with patient selection for bronchoscopy. We suggest bronchoscopy in patients with identified antigen or an HRCT that is consistent with a non-IPF diagnosis. Appropriate patient selection for bronchoscopy may improve ILD diagnostic confidence and avoid potential complications from more invasive and higher risk procedures.

The Effect of Lung Lavage Volume Return on the Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a commonly used tool in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Previous protocols recommend 30% lavage return, though no studies have investigated this relationship. This study aims to assess the influence of BAL volume return on VAP diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively maintained database for BAL performed from January 2015 to January 2016 in the trauma and surgical ICU at a level 1 trauma center. In total, 147 ventilated patients with clinical suspicion for pneumonia underwent 264 BALs. A protocol was used with five aliquots of 20 cc of saline instilled. Quantitative cultures were performed with 10ˆ5 colony-forming organisms as the threshold for VAP diagnosis. BAL was repeated at 6-8 d on 50 patients. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to investigate the predictors of VAP diagnosis. RESULTS: Patients with >40% lavage return had increased rates of VAP diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.86, P = 0.002). Increasing volume return also trended toward a lower false-negative rate. Temperature, leukocytosis, and X-ray infiltrate were not associated with increased VAP diagnosis. Concurrent antibiotic therapy at the time of BAL predicted decreased VAP diagnosis (OR 0.58, P = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, only >40% return remained associated with increased rate of VAP diagnosis (OR 4.00, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that >40% lavage volume return was associated with increased VAP diagnosis. Clinicians should consider the reliability of a negative BAL if clinical suspicion of VAP is high and lavage return is <40%. Additional investigation is needed to further elucidate this association.

The etiology of neonatal pneumonia, complicated by bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants with a "ventilator-associated" pneumonia (VAP) ranges between 7 to 50%. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the features of the etiological structure of neonatal pneumonia complicated by BPD, and to determine the sensitivity of pathogens to antibiotics. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 194 preterm infants with VAP, birth weight from 780 to 2820 g and gestational age from 27 to 37 weeks was conducted. A microbiological study of washings from the respiratory tract was conducted by standard qualitative and quantitative methods. RESULTS: Respiratory tract infections caused by E. coli (with hemolytic properties), Enterococcus spp. (with hemolytic properties), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, various types of mycoplasmas, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida krusei were found 4- 13 times more frequent in preterm infants with BPD than in preterm infants without BPD and more mature infants with or without this complication. BPD developed 7- 11 times more frequent in preterm infants with prolonged VAP and change in pathogens than in preterm infants with VAP without change of agent. BPD developed 5- 7 times more frequent in preterm infants with the association of pathogens than in preterm infants with a monoinfection. Massive colonization of respiratory tract pathogens by 1- 3 days of life (lg4 colony forming units in 1 ml and above) was an unfavorable prognostic factor for the development of VAP, complicated by BPD. CONCLUSION: The reduction in the frequency of BPD is might be possible with timeous and adequate antibacterial therapy of VAP.

Sarcoidosis in the UK: insights from British Thoracic Society registry data.

Introduction: The British Thoracic Society Sarcoidosis Registry allows physicians to record clinical data after gaining written consent from patients. The registry's aim is to phenotype sarcoidosis in the UK. Methods: Between February 2013 and July 2017, demographic details for 308 patients (with complete clinical data for 205 patients) presenting to 24 UK hospitals were recorded. This data was analysed to detail methods of presentation, diagnosis and management. Results: Fatigue was a significant complaint, affecting 30% of all patients. The most prevalent CT findings were nodules (in 77% of cases) with traction bronchiectasis (11%), distortion (9%) and ground glass (5%) less prominent. Of 205 patients with complete clinical data, only 64% had a diagnostic tissue biopsy. 35% of all patients underwent endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA) with 15% having a transbronchial biopsy. Use of EBUS-TBNA showed an overall increase over time, from 28% of all patients in 2013 to 43% in 2016. The most common steroid sparing treatment was methotrexate, but 42% of patients were not initiated on any pharmacological treatment at the time of inclusion. Discussion: Fatigue was common and has shown association with poor quality of life. We therefore suggest using a fatigue questionnaire as part of all new patient assessments. It may be that EBUS-TBNA should be reserved for cases of stage I or II disease where there is a reported higher yield than using transbronchial biopsy alone. Bronchoalveolar lavage was not widely used in our data, but it is generally a safe and useful adjunct and should be used more widely.

The diagnostic role of triple endoscopy in pediatric patients with chronic cough.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Multi-disciplinary aero-digestive centers provide high quality health care through improved outcomes and treatment costs over separate sub specialty clinics. These outcomes are often the result of a common investigative tool known as triple endoscopy: a rigid bronchoscopy performed by an otolaryngologist, flexible bronchoscopy and lavage obtained by a pulmonologist, and an endoscopy with guided biopsies performed by a gastroenterologist. Combining such procedures into one 'triple endoscopy' allows for diagnoses which otherwise might have been missed with just one procedure. The goal of our study was to describe the efficacy of the triple endoscopy procedure in diagnosing recalcitrant aero-digestive conditions, specifically chronic cough. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review METHODS: Multiple charts from children who underwent the triple endoscopy for chronic cough were retrospectively reviewed from 2005 and 2017. Complete data from the triple procedure was gathered on 243 patients, including findings by sub specialty (otolaryngology, pulmonology, and gastroenterology). RESULTS: Of the 243 patients with complete data who underwent triple endoscopy, 203 (83.5%) children had at least one positive finding. Of these children, 101 (41.5%) had one specialty specific diagnosis, and 102 (42%) had multiple cross specialty diagnoses. When describing the diagnoses, 63 children had gastro esophageal reflux (GER), 14 had eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), 118 had tracheomalacia, 54 had laryngeal clefts, and 102 children had positive bronchoalveolar lavages. Outcome data was available on 226 patients (93%), of these patients, 188 patients had a diagnosis from the triple scope. Of those patients with a diagnosis and outcome data, 144 (76.6%) children had an improved outcome as a result of a treatment plan targeting that diagnosis, while 16 of the 37 patients without a diagnosis improved. This difference was significant by chi square analysis (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The triple scope procedure is a useful investigative tool for patients with recalcitrant aero-digestive complaints like chronic cough. In particular, triple scope can yield more than one specialty specific diagnosis, normally missed by one procedure. The triple scope also leads to improved parental satisfaction by improved cost and healthcare outcomes.

An eleven-year retrospective cross-sectional study on pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare disease in the field of pulmonary medicine. The efficacy of whole-lung lavage (WLL) as the treatment of PAP had never been evaluated in the Iranian population. Therefore, there is a real need to investigate the characteristics of PAP and also to evaluate the efficacy of WLL in this rare disease. The study aimed to investigate demographic features, clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of the disease in Iranian PAP patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of 45 patients with definite diagnosis of PAP, who had regular follow-ups from March 2004 to March 2015 at an Iranian referral respiratory hospital, were collected. Whole-lung lavages (WLL) efficacy was assessed by comparing spirometric, arterial blood gas parameters and six-minute walk test (6MWT) results before and after all lavages. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis of disease was 30.33 ± 14.56 years. Four patients (8.8%) reported non-massive hemoptysis and three subjects (6.6%) had concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis. In 71.1% of cases, transbronchial lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage were sufficient for diagnosis. Spirometric results and arterial blood gas parameters and 6MWD improved significantly after all the lavages. Four patients (8.8%) died because of respiratory failure. The only variable capable of predicting treatment failure was the history of hemoptysis. CONCLUSION: The study revealed sufficiency of WLL as the PAP patients' treatment. Also hemoptysis was found to be the independent factor that can predict treatment failure.

Diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and Lung Foundation Australia position statements summary.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrosing interstitial lung disease associated with debilitating symptoms of dyspnoea and cough, resulting in respiratory failure, impaired quality of life and ultimately death. Diagnosing IPF can be challenging, as it often shares many features with other interstitial lung diseases. In this article, we summarise recent joint position statements on the diagnosis and management of IPF from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and Lung Foundation Australia, specifically tailored for physicians across Australia and New Zealand. Main suggestions: A comprehensive multidisciplinary team meeting is suggested to establish a prompt and precise IPF diagnosis. Antifibrotic therapies should be considered to slow disease progression. However, enthusiasm should be tempered by the lack of evidence in many IPF subgroups, particularly the broader disease severity spectrum. Non-pharmacological interventions including pulmonary rehabilitation, supplemental oxygen, appropriate treatment of comorbidities and disease-related symptoms remain crucial to optimal management. Despite recent advances, IPF remains a fatal disease and suitable patients should be referred for lung transplantation assessment.

Effect of positive perioperative donor and recipient respiratory bacterial cultures on early post-transplant outcomes in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: It is standard practice to administer prophylactic antibiotics post lung transplantation. However, no studies have evaluated the impact of culture positivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early post-transplant outcomes of culture-positive and culture-negative lung transplant (LT) recipients and the appropriateness of the empiric regimens used. METHODS: Adult patients who received an LT at Emory University Hospital between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2015 were reviewed and stratified into three groups: (i) culture-positive appropriate empiric treatment, (ii) culture-positive inappropriate empiric treatment, and (iii) culture-negative. Antibiotics were defined as appropriate if bacteria were sensitive to the empiric regimen. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, percent neutrophil count in a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sample, presence of airway ischemia, and appropriateness of the empiric antibiotic regimen. RESULTS: Nine, zero, and four patients died within 30 days in the culture-positive appropriate (n = 113), culture-positive inappropriate (n = 5), and culture-negative groups (n = 29) (P = .564) respectively. The median hospital LOS was 19, 16, and 15 days respectively. Median ICU LOS was 6, 5, and 7 respectively. The respective percent neutrophil counts in the BAL fluid were 79, 83, and 65. The presence of airway ischemia was only documented in eight patients, all in the culture-positive appropriate group. CONCLUSION: We did not identify an association between antibiotic appropriateness and 30-day mortality, hospital LOS, or ICU LOS in post-LT recipients.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) - common practice in Poland before the "antifibrotic drugs era".

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive and debilitating lung disease with a median survival time of 3-5 years. For now, pirfenidone (PIR) and nintedanib (NTB) are the only drugs that can slow down the disease's progression. In Poland, these drugs, although registered for legal use, had not been reimbursed for IPF patients until the end of the year 2016. Aim of the study was to assess what was common practice in terms of diagnosis and treatment in the period before antifibrotic drugs became available for IPF patients in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a survey among participants of two nationwide pulmonological congresses held in 2016. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty physicians took part in the study. Only 55% of respondents would reach their final diagnosis in collaboration with a radiologist. Just 40% of those sending patients for surgical lung biopsy (SLB) would discuss the case directly with a pathologist. 22% would never refer the patient suspected of having IPF for SLB. 85% believed that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be useful for diagnosis. 41% of respiratory professionals would not use any drug for the treatment of IPF patients. 23% of physicians would prescribe corticosteroids in high doses (CS), either in monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. Only 43% of respondents would use antacid drugs in case of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and only 11% would prescribe these drugs regardless of GERD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Polish pulmonologists were not supported by radiologists and pathologists in the diagnostic process. Treatment standards were unsatisfactory, mostly due to a lacking of reimbursement regulations. Further education is necessary to improve management of IPF patients in Poland.

[A retrospective study of the perioperative complications following whole lung lavage in the treatment of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis].

Objective: To evaluate the safety of the procedures of whole lung lavage(WLL) for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis(PAP) in perioperative period. Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected clinical data from 78 WLL procedures of PAP patients from January 2006 to June 2016 in Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease. The causes of perioperative complications were analyzed. Results: Eighteen (23.07%) of the 78 procedures developed complications, including pleural effusion(n=4), pneumonia(n=4), cardiac failure(n=2), cardiac arrhythmia (n=2), pneumothorax(n=2), atelectasis(n=1), lung edema(n=1), laryngeal edema(n=1), pleural effusion and pneumonia(n=1). All complications were mild and easy to treat. Seventy-four procedures had successful extubation, but 4 procedures developed a prolonged time of extubation. Age, DSS, PaCO(2,)FEV(1,)lavage volume, lavage times and underlying diseases were not predictors for any complications(each P>0.05). High fluid recovering rate had a protective effect against the occurring of complications (Wald=7.672, OR<0.01, P<0.05). Conclusions: Whole lung lavage was a safe procedure in the treatment of PAP. Complications could recovery after proper therapy. The perioperative complications showed a correlation with low fluid recover rate. Operation under guideline was the key to avoid complications.

Bronchoalveolar lavage for the treatment of neonatal pulmonary atelectasis under lung ultrasound monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary atelectasis (PA) is a common clinical complication among newborns, and it is one of the most common causes of neonatal dyspnea, a condition with no specific effective treatment. This study examined the effectiveness and security of bronchoalveolar lavage (BL) regarding the treatment of neonatal PA under ultrasound monitoring. METHODS: A total of 57 patients diagnosed with PA via lung ultrasound (LUS) were included in this study. All patients received BL via a tracheal intubation injection of lavage fluid. The LUS was conducted immediately after each lavage to understand the conditions of lung re-expansion. Irrigation was repeated two to three times as one course of treatment. BL was provided as one to two courses of treatment daily for several days according to atelectasis and lung recruitment status. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients, BL was very effective in 44 cases (77.2%), marginally effective in nine cases (15.8%) and ineffective in four cases (7.0%), showing a total effective rate of 93.0%. The four ineffective cases showed a long disease duration and severe pulmonary consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: BL showed significant effectiveness for the treatment of neonatal PA under ultrasound monitoring. This treatment is easy to operate, and no adverse side effects were observed. Thus, BL should be considered for clinical application.

Outcomes Bronchoscopic Evaluation in A University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Study of clinical profile of the patients and diagnostic yield of the selected bronchoscopic procedures gives us important information in clinical decision making and better patient care. There are hardly very few studies regarding these entities. Therefore, we decided to study clinical characteristics and outcomes of the patients who underwent bronchoscopic evaluation in our setting. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study the consecutive patients who underwent bronchoscopy from 1st May 2013- 30th April 2015 in division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine. The main procedure performed was bronchoalveolar lavage. RESULTS: The mean age was 54.71 years with 76 (76%) males. Recurrent hemoptysis in 58 (58%) patients were the commonest indication. Total 95 (95%) patients have chest X-ray abnormalities. The commonest bronchoscopic finding was bronchiectasis 23 (23%) of patients followed by chronic bronchitis in 18 (18%) and endobronchial tuberculosis in 16 (16%). Total 10 (71%) of the 14 bronchoscopically suspected lung cancer patients have intraluminal lesions. Bronchoalveolar lavage culture for tuberculosis showed growth in 46 (46%), positive for malignancy in 7 (7%) positive Ziehl Neelson stain for tuberculosis in 6 (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopic evaluation of patients with pulmonary diseases gives us a lot of information that may help us in better patient care and bronchoalveolar lavage has high diagnostic yield in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.